Fair procedures for appointments and promotions

Guideline
Position statement and recommendations on research assessment processes
To provide recommendations of assessments ranging from research career progression and the selection of project proposals for funding to the monitoring of ongoing research projects and the evaluation of finished ones.
The recommendations presented in this Position Statement provide a framework upon which research performing and research funding organisations can adapt their assessment processes and collaborate to reduce the increasing strains on the system and tackle the challenges faced. The recommendations also contribute to the task of future-proofing assessment processes for the broad changes to the research system that are underway. Potential improvements of assessment processes continually arise, and are increasingly facilitated by technological advances that can support the further adaptation of the system.
Reference of the resource
James Wilsdon, Liz Allen, Eleonora Belfiore, Philip Campbell, Stephen Curry, Steven Hill, Richard Jones, Roger Kain, Simon Kerridge, Mike Thelwall, Jane Tinkler, Ian Viney, Paul Wouters, Jude Hill, Ben Johnson, The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015) DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363.
Topic:
Research environment
Subopic:
Procedures for appointments, promotions and numeration
Type of resource:
Guideline
Relevant discipline(s):
All
Relevant stakeholder(s):
All stakeholders of scientific research
Relevant organisational level(s):
System (macro level)
Institution (meso level)
Published/put into force:
2020